City employees aren’t all shopping into Seattle’s possess trade program

by: BY KIPP ROBERTSON, MyNorthwest.com Writer
Updated: Mar 28, 2017 – 10:00 AM




“;
var imageDivId = “#”+”firstImageDisplayModal_500354138”;
if ($(“.reveal-modal-bg”).length == 0) {
$(“#wrapper”).after(“”);
}
if ($(imageDivId).length == 0) {
$(“#wrapper”).after(contentText);
}

SEATTLE – For a city that can’t hoop some-more vehicles on a roads, it certain is startling that a employees aren’t doing a improved pursuit during regulating choice modes of transportation.

Related: Murray announces millions in Seattle highway work

Related Headlines

In a recently expelled awards for a Commute Trip Reduction program, a City of Seattle radically gave itself a “Bronze” award. The endowment highlights and encourages city employees to cut down on pushing in cars alone.

“This 20 year partnership between a City and Seattle-based employers has yielded good results: 66% of commuters from participating businesses now use alternatives such as transit, walking, carpooling, bicycling, or telecommuting,” a matter on a city’s website reads. “These efforts are good for a City, for your employees, and for your business.”

Seattle’s best commuters – according to a City of Seattle — are a Gates Foundation and Stoel Rives LLP. But shouldn’t a city also exaggerate bullion or during slightest bullion status?

Just a few months ago, Scott Kubly, executive for a Seattle Department of Transportation, pronounced a city was already overloaded with vehicles.

“The City of Seattle can’t hoop any some-more cars than we now have,” Kubly told TransitCenter. “Our mode apart needs to go from 30 percent SOV [single-occupancy vehicle] to 25 percent SOV and a lion’s share of that is going to be carried on a bus.”

The idea for a travel module is to revoke a series of solo drivers in a city by 10 percent between 2012 and 2017.

Seattle has never indispensable overload service some-more than it does now. According to a latest INRIX trade scorecard, a city ranked 23rd altogether for a time drivers spent in congestion. It ranked 10th out of 240 cities in a U.S. and 11th out of 310 cities in North America. The scorecard analyzed overload in 1,064 cities in 38 countries. It should be remarkable that a INRIX information doesn’t embody China.

According to a Kirkland-based company, Seattle drivers spent 13 percent of their time in overload final year. A sum of 54.8 rise hours were in congestion.

Los Angeles, according to INRIX, has a misfortune congestion; drivers spent some-more than 100 hours in trade jams final year.

A apart data-driven investigate expelled by TomTom ranks Seattle fourth misfortune for overload in a nation and 53rd misfortune in a world.